A-70: Influence of hop regime, hop cultivar, and yeast on the hop aroma in beers using descriptive sensory analysis

D. C. SHARP (1), T. H. Shellhammer (1); (1) Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, U.S.A.

Poster

For centuries brewers have used hops to impart hoppy aroma and flavor to beer. Creative experimentation and the renaissance of craft brewing over the past 30 years have increased the complexity of these hoppy aromas. This increase, accomplished by sophisticated hopping regimes and a diversity of new hop cultivars, has compounded the analytical difficulty of understanding and controlling hop aroma in beer. Many factors influence the final hop aroma properties of beer: hop variety, dosage, and yeast interactions to name a few. This study focused on the influence of these factors on the sensory properties of otherwise identically brewed beer using descriptive sensory analysis techniques. Twenty-one different beers were brewed by varying three factors in a full factorial experimental design: hop cultivar (Simcoe, Hallertau Mittelfrueh), timing of hop addition (60 min boil, 20 min whirlpool, 48 hr dry-hopping), and yeast (WL 1056 ale, WL 2124 lager, OSU2 wine) and their requisite fermentation conditions. Three unhopped control beers were brewed using each of the three yeasts mentioned above. Hops were dosed at a constant mass of 1.5 g/L of wort/beer. This experimental design allowed the contribution of each factor, along with their interactions, to be described from a purely sensory perspective using a trained panel. Not surprisingly, beers brewed with highly aromatic Simcoe hops produced more intense and individually distinct aromas depending on the hopping regime compared to the Hallertau Mittelfrueh (HHA) hopped beers. Beers brewed with HHA hops showed less intense aromas with less distinction between hopping regimes, except for the dry-hopped treatment, which was characterized by a more floral aroma than the other HHA treatments. Hop aroma was also affected by a hop variety by yeast interaction, a hopping regime by yeast interaction, or both. The ale yeast produced the most intense hop aromas, followed by the lager yeast, and finally the wine yeast. It is likely that the intense non–hop-derived aromas contributed by the POF+ wine yeast masked the intensity of the aroma contributed by the different hop treatments, suggesting that non–hop-derived contributions interfere with hoppy aromas. This study is part of a multi-phased project that aims to relate the sensory findings presented here to the analytical and instrumental findings from subsequent studies to identify and quantify the factors influencing hop aroma in beer.

Daniel Sharp is a Ph.D. student in the Food Science and Technology Department at Oregon State University. His work is centered around hop studies being conducted in Thomas Shellhammer’s lab. A native Oregonian, Daniel earned a B.A. degree from the University of Oregon and his M.S. degree from Oregon State University. He has presented hop aroma research at the 2011 and 2012 Craft Brewer’s Conferences, 2011 MBAA Annual Conference, 2012 World Brewing Congress, and 2012 Young Scientist Symposium. Daniel is the 2012 recipient of the InBev Baillett-Latour Brewing Scholarship to fund his Ph.D. work. His current research is focused on developing a predictive model for hop aroma in finished beer.

View Presentation

Purchase and login is required to access presentations. Purchase access to the Proceedings.